Research
My research focuses on the application of economic rationalities and techniques of government in economic and environmental policymaking in the European Union. I am interested in the relationship between economic thought, the economics discipline and their role in making liberal, neoliberal, and post-neoliberal modes of government. My research brings together insights from economics, the social sciences, history, philosophy and science and technology studies to form a unique cultural economic approach that highlights the performative nature of economic knowledge. Recently, I have become especially interested in the question whether in current EU policy one witnesses a move away from neoliberal modes of policy making and if so, what this ‘de-economization’ entails.
My current research projects center on the politics of environmental market making. Environmental markets are markets that are developed and created to address environmental concerns. While environmental market making can be encountered in many shapes and forms, ranging from emissions trading, other offset schemes, green certificates, renewable energy products, clean technologies, biofuels, and certification schemes for green investment or consumption, they all revolve around the application of market rationalities and techniques as a means to reach environmental objectives. What are the main political challenges of using market instruments in the environmental field and do these call for adjustments?
My most recent project, titled ‘The Technopolitics of Environmental Market Making: The Case of the EU’s Hydrogen Strategy’ studies how EU policies aim to create a market for renewable or low-carbon hydrogen in an attempt to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors. It dissects the various aspects of the complex process of environmental market making and reviews the various technopolitical issues and concerns that emerge alongside each of these. Tracing the political contestation that accompanies each step of the EU’s hydrogen strategy, the project affords a analytical perspective on attempts at creating the ‘Hydrogen Economy,’ a policy idea with a long and twisted history. The project also provides valuable lessons on the technopolitical issues that more generally attend many other initiatives of environmental market making.
One of my upcoming publications, examines the role of economics in the history of emissions trading (‘A Study in Economization: The Performative History of Emissions Trading,’ in preparation). Going against a commonly held belief, the paper shows that economics had only a lateral impact on the earliest applications of emissions trading and that practical policy innovations were equally if not more important in the making of this idea. In earlier publications I have addressed the rise of behavioral economics in EU policymaking (‘Behavioralizing Europe: Behavioral Economics Enters EU Policymaking,’ 2019), the rise of market thinking and market discourse at Dutch policy advisory councils (‘Wrestling with the Market: the Many Faces of Neoliberalism at Dutch Policy Advisory Councils, 1998-2005 (in Dutch), 2019), and the uses of economics in EU port policy (‘Port Economics in Search of an Audience: The Public Life of Marginal Social Cost Pricing for Ports’ with Thomas Vanoutrive, 2019).
My paper titled ‘Thinking Like an Economist: The Neoliberal Politics of the Economics Textbook’ received the Helen Potter Award for best article in the Review of Social Economy in 2014.
My areas of specialization are: Political Economy of European Integration, History and Philosophy of Neoliberalism and Post-Neoliberalism, Governmentality, Cultural Economy, History and Methodology of Economics, and Science and Technology Studies.