This protocol sets out the agreements made by the universities with the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) and the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) concerning the review of publicly-funded research in the Netherlands.
According to SEP, research should be reviewed every six years by external and independent experts, usually at the level of research institutes. The evaluations provide boards and research units with the opportunity to monitor and improve the quality of research. By periodically evaluating research in terms of quality and societal relevance, accountability is also ensured to the government and society.
The Strategy Evaluation Protocol for 2021-2027 was adopted by Universiteiten van Nederland (UNL), Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen (KNAW) and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO). The protocol emphasizes that the evaluation of the research is done in the context of the goals and strategy of the research unit. The protocol also pays attention to aspects such as Open Science, Academic Culture, HR policy and PhD policy.
Research units can decide for themselves which indicators they deem appropriate for evaluating their unit's research. No quantitative assessment criteria are given to study units.
Since 2015, the quality assurance of national research schools has been carried out by the SEP review committee on the basis of the Handreiking kwaliteitsbeoordeling onderzoeksscholen (in Dutch).
The reports in which the results of the visitations are recorded and the administrative responses of the Executive Board are public. Via the references below, the most recent visitation reports, executive summaries and administrative responses can be downloaded per faculty and per research unit.
Report AIHR ASCA assessment
Report AIHR NICA assessment
Report AIHR OSL assessment
Report AIHR RMeS assessment
Final report AHM
Final report ARTES
Final report ASH
Position Statement CvB ACLC
Position Statement CvB AHM
Position Statement CvB ARTES
Position Statement CvB ASCA
Position Statement CvB ASH
Position statement CvB Anthropology 2013-2018
Report Anthropology 2013-2018
UvA RICDE Self Evaluation 2018
Position Statement CvB Communication Science 2014-2019
Report research review Communication Science 2014-2019
Position Statement CvB Political Science 2013-2019
Report research review Political Science 2013-2019
Position Statement CvB GPIO 2013-2019
Report research review Spatial Sciences 2013-2019
Position Statement CvB RICDE
Bestuurlijk standpunt CvB onderzoeksevaluatie Sociologie 2013-2018
Report research review Sociology 2013-2018
Bestuursstandpunt Psychology 2011-2016
Psychology 2017
Report API & NOVA 2017-2022
Report HIMS 2017-2022
Report IBED 2017-2022
Report NATST/Institute of Physics 2017-2023
Report SILS 2017-2023
Final report Mathematics SEP research review 2022
Bestuursstandpunt Informatics Institute 2015-2020
Research Review Computer Science 2015-2020
Position Statement CvB Kortweg- De Vries Instituut
Bestuursstandpunt Institute for Logic, Language and Computation 2012-2017
Report Institute for Logic, Language and Computation 2012-2017
Bestuursstandpunt Chemistry Ecology and Life Sciences 2011-2016
Report Chemistry Ecology and Life Sciences 2011-2016
Bestuursstandpunt Physics 2010-2016
Report Physics 2010-2016