Annemarie Mol is professor of Anthropology of the
Body. In her work she
combines the ethnographic study of practices with the task of
shifting our
theoretical repertoires. Her most important research lines to
date:
Saying 'lekker' (in Dutch) is not quite the same as saying
'tasty' or
'delicious' (in English) and both these terms differ from
'nice'. A lot
may be learned from attending in detail to words, their
contexts and
their effects.
Objects of knowledge may be understood as focal points of
different
perspectives. But it is also possible to trace how they are
being handled
(sliced, questioned, coloured, cooked up) in varied
knowledge
practices. If we do the latter, then it appears that
objects-in-practice
(say 'anaemia', 'atherosclerosis', or 'body') tend to come in
many
versions. These versions are both different and
interdependent: multiple.
Decision trees suggest linear ways of working where one
thing follows
from and after the other. However, in many practices, care
practices
included, time is not an arrow and entities are not brought
into being
just once, but keep on changing. Rather than fitting fantasies of control,
such processes depend on endless tinkering. Such tinkering,
if done
well, is care.
Everything happens somewhere. And then things travel between
places.
But in which kind of space to situate events, techniques and
objects?
There are various topological figures to consider, such as
regions,
networks, fluids and fires. They each order and allow for
travel,
boundaries, similarity and difference - differently.
What happens if we take 'eating' as a model of what it is to
know, to act
and/or to relate? This is the research project that Mol
currently works on
with the Eating Bodies in Practice and Theory team. As a part
of this
project we take a fresh look at what it is to eat. What, in
practice, are
tasting, digesting, wasting, thriving, appreciating? What kind
of relations
between organisms does 'eating' craft and encourage? What is
'an eating
body' and where does it begin and end? How does 'eating'
enduringly
change the world?
2010- Professor Anthropology of the Body, University of Amsterdam
2008-2010 Socrates Professor Social Theory, Humanism & Materiality, University of Amsterdam, 1 day a week
1996-2008 Socrates Professor Political Philosophy, University of Twente, 1 day a week
1996-2009 Senior researcher on grants from NWO & Zon/Mw, University of Twente, 4 days a week
1990-1995 Post-doc on a Constantijn & Christiaan Huygens Grant NWO Maastricht University & University of Utrecht
1984-1989 Junior researcher, Philosophy, Universiteit Groningen
1989 PhD Philosophy, University of
Groningen
1985 Political Science, First Year Exams,
University of Amsterdam
1984 Postdoctoral course Sociology of Care,
University of Amsterdam
1982/3 Postdoctoral Anthropology, Sociology &
Philosophy seminars in Paris
1982 Masters Philosophy, University of
Utrecht
1982 Masters Medicine, Free Program, University
of Utrecht, cum laude
1976 Gymnasium B, Coriovallum College,
Heerlen
2006- Member of the Social Scientific Council of the Royal Academy of Sciences
2004 Ludwig Fleck Book Prize of the Society for
the Social Studies of Science for The Body Multiple
2004 The Sociology of Health and Illness Book
Prize for TheBody Multiple
1990 Dr. R.J. van Helsdingen prize of the Dutch
Society for Psychiatry and Philosophy for Ziek is het Woord
niet
2010-2015 ERC Advanced Grant: The Eating Body in Western
Practice and Theory
2011-2014 ORA Grant: Memorials and remains of medical
research in Africa
2005-2009 Ethics, Research & Policy, NWO: Good food,
good information
2001-2004 ZonMw: The two faces of patient autonomy
2000-2004 Ethics & Policy NWO: Genres of good care in
psychiatry
1996 -2000 Ethics & Policy NWO: Norms incorporated.
Technology and the good life
1990-1995 Constantijn & Christiaan Huijgens Grant NWO:
Differences in Medicine
In what way is »care« a matter of »tinkering«? Rather than
presenting care
as a (preferably »warm«) relation between human beings, the
various
contributions to the volume give the material world (usually
cast as »cold«)
a prominent place in their analysis. Thus, this book does not
continue to
oppose care and technology, but contributes to rethinking both
in such a
way that they can be analysed together.
What is good care? In this innovative and compelling book,
Annemarie
Mol, analysing care practices for and by people with diabetes,
argues
that good care has little to do with 'patient choice'. Instead, it
depends on jointly, attentively, adapting bodies, technologies and daily life
to each other. Again and again, until the day we die.
The Body Multiple is an extraordinary ethnography of an
ordinary disease.
Drawing on fieldwork in a Dutch university hospital, Annemarie
Mol looks
at the day-to-day diagnosis and treatment of
atherosclerosis. A patient
information leaflet might describe atherosclerosis as the
gradual obstruction
of the arteries, but in hospital practice this one medical
condition appears
to be many other things as well. The book explores the work
invested in
making different versions of reality hang together.
Much recent social science and humanities work has been
a
revolt against simplification. This volume explores the
contrast between
simplicity and complexity to reveal that this dichotomy,
itself, is too
simplistic. John Law and Annemarie Mol have gathered a
distinguished
panel of contributors who offer empirical case studies that
theorise
simplicity/complexity.
Western medicine-especiallyincontrast with non-Western
traditions of
medical practice-is widely thought of as a coherent and
unified field in
which beliefs, definitions, and judgments are shared. Marc
Berg and
Annemarie Mol debunk this myth with an interdisciplinary
andintercultural
collection of essays that reveals the significantly
variedwayspractitioners
of "conventional" Western medicine handle bodies, study
testresults,
configure statistics, and converse with patients.
Taal verandert snel. Dat geldt ook voor de taal waarmee in
de veertig jaar
na de Tweede Wereldoorlog in de Nederlandse
huisartsgeneeskunde en
geestelijke volksgezondheid gepraat en geschreven is over de
mensen die
er hulp zochten (patiënten of klanten), de zaken die ze
aandroegen
(ziekten, problemen, hulpvragen), de verbanden waar ze deel
van
uitmaakten (volk, klasse, populatie) en ga zo maar door. Dit
boek
analyseert veranderingen in de taal die tussen 1945 en 1985
werd gebruikt
in Nederlandstalige professionele tijdschriften.